SB 8 WILL BE HEARD IN THE SENATE PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION COMMITTEE ON MONDAY AT 2PM
Posted over 4 years ago by Derek Leffert
This announcement has 1 attachment:
As expected, Sen. Riddle has decided to hear testimony on SB 8. She scheduled a hearing for Monday, February 1st at 2PM for oral testimony.
SB 8, filed by Chairwoman Riddle, is nearly identical to last year’s SB 942, which as you may recall contained disastrous provisions that redefined surgery and prevented NPs with doctorate degrees from using the title. This measure would have SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS on NP practice and we are asking APRNs to submit written or oral testimony to the Senate committee to OPPOSE this legislation.
As you may have heard, the number of people allowed in committee hearings is rather limited with COVID restrictions, but all who wish to be heard can attend and present their oral testimony. If you would rather submit written testimony, you would need to fill out the attached witness form AND complete the Senate Witness Registration System by creating an account here: Senate Witness System | Missouri Senate (mo.gov) .
Please be concise and focused in your testimony and focus on the reasons why you believe that SB 8 is detrimental to patients in Missouri.
Our concerns on this particular piece of legislation are as follows:
Definition of Surgery – Despite any suggestions to the contrary, proposed revisions to 334.010.6 will significantly and detrimentally limit procedures that are currently routinely performed in countless health care facilities all across Missouri. In addition to prohibiting routine procedures that are commonly performed, this revision would place an even greater burden on physicians to perform these tasks that are now completed by other competent health care providers, thereby increasing the demand on the physician workforce.
Use of Title – Many of the proposed revisions in SB 8 seek to impose punitive penalties on health care providers for utilizing titles that they have rightfully earned through their academic and clinical education. Tens of thousands of Missourians have earned doctorate degrees across a diverse spectrum of professions including, but not limited to, nurses, veterinarians, chiropractors, physical therapists, and numerous others. While we agree that no profession should infer that they are physicians when they are not, we also strongly oppose efforts to inhibit those who have achieved the highest level of education from using an academic title. Furthermore, existing statutes provide for penalties for misrepresentations on qualifications, making this proposed language duplicative and unnecessary.
Advertising – Several proposed revisions contained within SB 8 provide a mechanism for penalties against providers for circumstances that are often beyond their control or for which they have no knowledge of. Language that penalizes practitioners for using academic titles in signs, literature, and other material when those decisions are often made by advertising or marketing professionals is inherently unfair, particularly when the health care provider has no knowledge or role in the action that this bill’s language defines.
If you'd like to reach out to members of the Senate Professional Registration Committee in advance of Monday's 2PM hearing, you can reach any of the senators listed below by contacting them by phone or email.
Sen. Jeanie Riddle
573-751-2757
jeanie.riddle@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Eric Burlison
573-751-1503
eric.burlison@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Doug Beck
573-751-0220
doug.beck@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Karla Eslinger
573-751-1882
karla.eslinger@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Mike Moon
573-751-1480
mike.moon@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Barbara Washington
573-751-3158
barbara.washington@senate.mo.gov
Sen. Paul Wieland
573-751-1492
paul.wieland@senate.mo.gov
***Please note that we are NOT asking you to contact all senators, but instead ONLY the senators on the Senate Professional Registration Committee listed above.
Passage of this bill could have significant consequences for Missouri NPs and your patients, so YOUR involvement is essential.
If you have questions or would like some additional guidance, please email us at nursepractitioners@missourinp.org
Thank you in advance for taking a few minutes of your time. It is both necessary and appreciated.
Comments
No comments yet.
Julie Carpenter Long and I will be there!
I was able to get a hold of the Missouri Board of Nursing concerning my Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner collaborative practice agreement and was told that it does not specify anywhere that the collaborative practice agreement has to be with a psychiatrist, it just says physician.
Also, can you please answer a question, why is Senator Riddle's thought process unable to differentiate between a title and a degree? All Physician's are medical doctors, but not all doctors are medical physicians I am unable to comprehend her personal vendetta against nurses, especially during a pandemic. We are out here in her great state of Missouri taking care of the physically and emotionally ill, while she chooses to fight a senseless baseless political battle over a title. Maybe she can tell Dr. Jill Biden that she should not use the title of "Doctor" either. Sorry, but I am presently in a doctorate program and I work in mental health so such a menial political agenda infuriates me.
altplace@yahoo.com
Done!
i agree whole heartedly, I think this SB8 is unethical, why would one profession try to limit another profession scope of practice. Just try to get a doctor's appt it is 2 or 3 weeks, not with NP's. Also the increase cost of office procedures with a physician vs an NP doing it, and the pt being sent to the ED, the increase cost, wait time and inconvenience. Just try to Jill Biden she cannot use her Dr. title
Jan - I can't speak to Sen. Riddle's thought process, but I do know that she has been asked to carry this legislation by the Missouri State Medical Association. Our nursing organizations stand united to defeat this unnecessary legislation and appreciate your support.
Unfortunately, that makes sense. A pushed political agenda that contains no moral or ethical thought process of her own. It appears that they are making a fool out of her because this bill does not include intellectual thought, nor will it benefit the people of Missouri in any way. Are there other states seeking such a bill, or just Missouri?
Only active members can comment on this announcement.
Learn more about membership